A comparison of the beatles and the rolling stones
The beatles or the stones: which side are you on top photo: paul mccartney of the beatles and mick jagger of the rolling stones sit opposite each other on a train at london’s euston station . Music, film, tv and political news coverage. The rolling stones have influenced people since the time of the beatles and still influence people today there songs sound better then the cookie cutter beatles songs, and keith richards has more talent in his pinky finger then all the beatles had together. “the beatles vs the rolling stones” – it’s kind of a silly debate, if not nearly as silly as “the beatles vs the four seasons,” as vee-jay records titled one cash-in lp.
The beatles vs the rolling stones the beatles always came first by comparison every other band coming out of the uk seemed to be a response not only were the . The beatles gave us some great movies, help, a hard days night, and yellow submarine, but the rolling stones have recorded a whole bunch of live concerts on dvd and most recently blue ray and on itunes as well. The rolling stones hated to be compared with the beatles, but after 50 years they still are.
The beatles obviously had a bigger cultural impact, but i think when you compare the individual members the rolling stones are superior mick jagger is a far greater frontman than john or paul, keith richards and mick taylor were better guitarists than george, and charlie watts is a better drummer than ringo. Which band was better, the beatles or the rolling stones ahhh, the age old question over all, probably the beatles there’s no need to compare the beatles . The beatles of the rollings stones can either claim dominance over the other the debate between the beatles and the rolling stones has been going on ever since they first crossed paths on the . The rolling stones: in the shadow of the beatles again by comparison, the beatles had notched three number-one albums in the us by the end of 1964 and four number-one singles during one . Boards community central the vestibule battle of the bands: beatles vs rolling stones battle of the bands: beatles vs rolling stones there really is no comparison beatles .
The beatles vs the rolling stones the debate has been raging for decades, and it will never die the two iconic british invaders are inextricably linked in history, influencing and rivaling each . Free essay: i’m here today to discuss, compare, and contrast the beatles and the rolling stones, two of the best rock and roll bands from the 1960s during. Introduction (from wikipedia) the beatles were a rock and pop band from liverpool, england that formed in 1960 during their career, the group primarily consisted of john lennon, paul mccartney, george harrison and ringo starr the rolling stones are an english rock band formed in 1962 in london . Determine whether each album is from the beatles or rolling stones test your knowledge on this music quiz to see how you do and compare your score to others quiz by brimtown beatles vs rolling stones - album blitz quiz - by brimtown. The beatles 0 1 the rolling stones next 10 famous pop songs you didn't realise were covers + wwe chris jericho interview: fozzy, “judas”, wwe & rock stardom 5 best metal albums of august .
A comparison of the beatles and the rolling stones
The beatles are a top 10 band the rolling stones and queen aren't even top 1000 bands even the stones and the beatles are hard to compare, they both came from england, they both changed over . Beatles vs rolling stones the beatles was formed in liverpool in 1960 by george harrison, john lennon, paul mccartney, and ringo starr their success story started in 1962 with their first hit love me do and they soon became a global phenomenon. Fifty years since the rolling stones released their first single, greg kot asks whether the band’s music has suffered from comparison with the beatles.
- The rolling stones arrived on the scene around the same time the beatles did at first, the stones tried out the clean cut look but soon found that it was not for them they quickly adopted a much rougher, quirkier image than the beatles.
- Last october, one of my biggest crowds came at the tiverton, rhode island library i return to tiverton tomorrow to deliver one of my favorite program topics, a comparison of the beatles and the rolling stones:.
- Battle: the beatles versus the rolling stones some basic comparisons and examples of influence during the years of friendly competition same songs sung:.
The stones played the beatles five demo tracks they’d just recorded at ibc studios, and they were eager to show off their treasured collection of american imports. The beatles and the rolling stones represent two sides of one of the twentieth century's greatest aesthetic debates in this excerpt from his book beatles vs stones, john mcmillian describes . The thing about the stones is they dont have many iconic hits in the way the beatles and queen do, but the albums themselves are less filler the thing about the beatles is they do both better than . The rolling stones vs the beatles essaysby the summer of 1965, the so-called british invasion of pop music was at its peak and while there were many worthy uk groups occupying the number 2 and below slots, the beatles at 1(a) and arguably, the rolling stones at 1(b),were, well, musically number on.